In a peer review setting, what should be captured regarding the module reviews?

In a peer review setting, capturing approval and sign-offs for ISO purposes is critical because it ensures that all relevant stakeholders have formally acknowledged and accepted the module in question. This process is essential for maintaining compliance with international quality standards, such as those established by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). It serves as a formal record that the review process was conducted thoroughly and that the outputs of the review have met established criteria.

By documenting approvals and sign-offs, organizations can demonstrate a commitment to quality assurance and governance practices, which are key components of continual improvement methodologies. This includes providing accountability and traceability in the software development lifecycle, which can be crucial during audits, reviews, or any assessments by external bodies.

Capturing only user acceptance criteria, completed test results, or budget implications may overlook the formal agreement that ensures the integrity and quality of the module while failing to meet organizational or regulatory compliance requirements. Therefore, thorough documentation of approvals and sign-offs becomes a cornerstone for maintaining strategic alignment and governance in peer review settings.