What is a good practice concerning bug severity in project quality assurance?

Monitoring both severity 1 and 2 bugs is a good practice in project quality assurance because it ensures a comprehensive approach to maintaining software quality. Severity 1 bugs are critical issues that can severely impact the functionality or usability of the application, often requiring immediate attention. However, severity 2 bugs, while not as critical, can still affect user experience or lead to larger issues if left unaddressed.

By tracking both levels of severity, the quality assurance team can prioritize and address bugs effectively, ensuring that both critical and significant issues are managed appropriately. This proactive approach not only improves the overall quality of the product but also enhances user satisfaction by minimizing the likelihood of unresolved issues impacting users.

Overlooking less severe bugs could lead to cumulative effects that degrade user experience over time, while solely focusing on feature delivery can undermine the integrity of the application. Hence, a balanced focus allows for a healthy, sustainable approach to software development and quality assurance.